Affiliate disclosure.

What we are paid for

When you open an account with an operator through a link on this site, that operator pays us a commission. The links that do this are the ones labelled Visit {Brand} in a ranking table, and they carry rel="nofollow sponsored" in the markup so they are machine-identifiable as commercial. Every other link on the site — a provincial page, a regulator, a helpline, an operator's own terms — pays us nothing.

We currently hold operator records for 12 brands and can render 10 of them in a table. Nothing about that commercial relationship is hidden behind a review score: the score is built from registration status, measured payout windows, payment rails, support and terms, and it determines the order of the table on its own.

What the commission does not change

• Position. Tables are ordered by review score. The commission is the same whether a brand sits first or last, so there is nothing to buy.
• Eligibility. Whether a brand appears for a province at all is read from a provincial register, not from a commercial agreement. A brand we are paid by still disappears from a province where it is not registered.
• Inclusion. A brand cannot pay to be added. Conversely, registered brands we have no relationship with are named on the Alberta page rather than quietly left out.
• The absence of promotional copy. We publish no offers or incentives anywhere on this site. That is a compliance decision, and no commercial arrangement reopens it.

Why there are no promotional offers to disclose

AGCO’s marketing standards prohibit advertising inducements to players located in Ontario, and the restriction reaches affiliates rather than stopping at the operator. Alberta's advertising standards took the same line when its market opened on July 13, 2026. Instead of showing one version of a page in one province and another elsewhere, we removed that layer from the entire site, in both languages.

The practical consequence for you as a reader: what you see here is the same page an Ontario regulator would see, and the ranking factors are all ones we can put in a table.

How much of this site earns nothing

Of the 12 brands we hold a record for, 3 carry a commercial link: JackpotCity, Royal Vegas, Spin Casino. The other 7 appear in tables with no link at all, and their cards say "no link held for this brand" rather than dropping them or pointing you somewhere we were not asked to point you. A comparison site that only shows the brands it is paid by is a price list; the gap has to be visible for the rest of the table to mean anything.

The imbalance is starker by province. Alberta's live register held 27 sites when it was last read, and 23 of them are sites we hold no relationship with whatsoever. They are named in full on the Alberta page. On the arithmetic alone, most of what this site tells you about Alberta is about sites that will never pay us anything.

How to check any of this yourself

None of the above is worth much as an assertion, so each part of it is checkable without taking our word for it:

• The commercial links. View the source of any ranking table and search for sponsored. Every link we are paid for carries it; if a link does not, we are not being paid for it.
• The ordering. The score sits in its own column. Read down it and check it falls monotonically, then check where the linked brands actually sit. If a paid brand ever appears above a higher-scoring one, the table is broken and we would want to know.
• The eligibility. Every province page links the register it is driven from, and every register figure carries the date it was read. Open the register, compare the names, and the difference should be explained by the date and nothing else.
• The omissions. Registered brands we hold nothing for are listed by name. Count them against the register and the two numbers should reconcile exactly.

What happens when a commercial relationship changes

A commercial arrangement is not a ranking event. If a brand already in a table signs with us, nothing about its row moves: the score was built from registration status, payout windows, rails, support and terms, and none of those changed because a contract did. The only visible difference is that a row which previously read "no link held" acquires a link. In the other direction, a brand whose arrangement ends keeps its row, its score and its review, and simply loses the link again. The table is a record of the market, and a record that reshuffles itself whenever our invoicing changes would not be one.

The same applies to a brand we would rather not send you to. If a registered brand scores badly we still publish the score and the reasons, and we would sooner carry a poor score for a brand that pays us than quietly delete the row. Deleting it is the version of this that is invisible to a reader, which is exactly why it is worth naming as something we do not do.

How a commercial link is built

Every commercial link points at a page on this site under /go/ rather than straight out to the operator. That page carries noindex,nofollow, tells you where you are going and that we are paid, and links this disclosure before it forwards you. The path is disallowed in robots.txt and kept out of the sitemap, so none of it is presented to a search engine as content. The outbound link on that page carries rel="nofollow sponsored noopener", as does the button you clicked to reach it. It is a slower way to run an affiliate link than sending you out directly, and it is the version where every hop is inspectable.

What our figures are, and what they are not

Payout windows, minimum deposits and payment rails on this site are recorded values, taken from operator terms and banking pages. They are not stopwatch measurements: we have not opened an account at every brand and timed a withdrawal, and anywhere the copy says a rail pays inside a window it means that window is on record, not that we watched it happen. Independent timing is something we would like to add and have not done, and saying so costs less than a claim that would not survive being checked.

Who we are

An independent Canadian comparison site. We are not a casino, not an operator, and not affiliated with any provincial regulator or Crown corporation. Regulator names, agency names and provincial-site names appear here as facts about the market, never as an endorsement of this site by them.